Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
32% cheaper
Tulsa is 32% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $51,000 in Tulsa.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Oklahoma salaries · Massachusetts salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Tulsa has a housing index of 63 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Tulsa costs $175,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $165,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $950 in Tulsa versus $1,600 in Worcester.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Tulsa scores 95 while Worcester scores 106.
Healthcare costs in Tulsa (91) are lower than Worcester (115).
Median household income in Tulsa is $48,278 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Tulsa.
Amazon affiliate links