⚖️ City Comparison

Tulsa vs Warwick

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Tulsa

Oklahoma
85
Very Affordable
$175,000
Median Home
$950/mo
Median Rent
$48,278
Median Income

Warwick

Rhode Island
116
Expensive
$350,000
Median Home
$1,570/mo
Median Rent
$61,200
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

27% Cheaper

Tulsa is 27% cheaper than Warwick overall. A $75,000 salary in Tulsa is equivalent to $102,353 in Warwick.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Tulsa (left) vs Warwick (right). National average = 100.

Housing
63
Housing
116
Groceries
95
Groceries
112
Utilities
92
Utilities
113
Transportation
98
Transportation
115
Healthcare
91
Healthcare
121

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Tulsa versus Warwick. Differences shown from Tulsa perspective.

ItemTulsaWarwickDifference
1-Bed Rent$710/mo$1,090/mo$-380.00
2-Bed Rent$950/mo$1,570/mo$-620.00
3-Bed Rent$1,260/mo$2,030/mo$-770.00
Bread (loaf)$2.80$3.04$-0.24
Milk (gallon)$3.47$4.27$-0.80
Eggs (dozen)$3.03$3.76$-0.73
Coffee (latte)$5.24$6.20$-0.96
Gas (gallon)$3.35$3.47$-0.12
Restaurant Meal$13.48$17.11$-3.63

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Tulsa has the same purchasing power as $102,353 in Warwick.

Conversely, $75,000 in Warwick equals $54,957 in Tulsa.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$54,487
Tulsa (Oklahoma)
$54,112
Warwick (Rhode Island)

The $375 difference is driven by Rhode Island having a higher state income tax rate. Oklahoma details → · Rhode Island details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
85 vs 116

Reading These Numbers: Tulsa (85) vs Warwick (116)

Tulsa at 85 is 15% below the US average, while Warwick at 116 is 16% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Tulsa, the composite index of 85 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 63, followed by groceries (95), utilities (92), transportation (98), and healthcare (91). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $950/mo in Tulsa and $1,570/mo in Warwick, the annual rent difference is approximately $7,440.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $37,200.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $175,000.0 difference in median home prices between Tulsa and Warwick translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Tulsa vs Warwick

Choosing between Tulsa and Warwick involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

The cost gap between Tulsa and Warwick reflects thousands of individual pricing differences across housing markets, grocery chains, utility providers, and healthcare networks. No two households experience the same effective cost of living even in the same city, which is why the category breakdown matters more than the headline number. Adjust the lifestyle weighting sliders above to see how your spending priorities shift the comparison between these specific metros.