Tulsa vs Lubbock

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Oklahoma salaries · Texas salaries

Living in Tulsa vs Lubbock

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Tulsa has a housing index of 63 while Lubbock sits at 59 (national average = 100). The median home in Tulsa costs $175,000 compared to $175,000 in Lubbock, a difference of $0. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $950 in Tulsa versus $950 in Lubbock.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Tulsa scores 95 while Lubbock scores 93.

Healthcare costs in Tulsa (91) are higher than Lubbock (90).

Median household income in Tulsa is $48,278 compared to $49,834 in Lubbock. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

Relocating: Tulsa vs Lubbock

If you are considering a move between Tulsa (index: 85) and Lubbock (index: 83), the 2% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Lubbock is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Tulsa can afford $1,126/month, while the median household in Lubbock can afford $1,163/month. With median homes at $175,000 in Tulsa versus $175,000 in Lubbock, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $950/month in Tulsa and $950/month in Lubbock, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Lubbock where costs are 17% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Tulsa (85) vs Lubbock (83)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Tulsa at 85 is 15% below the US average, while Lubbock at 83 is 17% below average. Both cities are relatively affordable compared to the national average.

Tulsa and Lubbock land within 2 points of each other on the composite index (85 vs 83), so the overall cost picture is similar. Housing shows the widest single-category margin at 63 versus 59, making it the area where residents will feel the most day-to-day price difference between Tulsa and Lubbock. Housing costs are comparable between the two metros, with Tulsa at 63 and Lubbock at 59 on the housing sub-index and median home prices of $175,000 and $175,000 respectively. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Tulsa has an edge in utilities, while Lubbock is more affordable for housing and groceries. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $950/month in Tulsa and $950/month in Lubbock, the annual rent difference is approximately $0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $0 difference in median home prices between Tulsa and Lubbock translates to roughly $0 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links