Tulsa vs Eugene
Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Tulsa
Eugene
๐ก The Verdict
26% cheaper
Tulsa is 26% more affordable than Eugene. A $75,000 salary in Eugene is equivalent to $55,435 in Tulsa.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
๐ฐ Salary Equivalence
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Oklahoma salaries ยท Oregon salaries
Living in Tulsa vs Eugene
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Tulsa has a housing index of 63 while Eugene sits at 130 (national average = 100). The median home in Tulsa costs $175,000 compared to $380,000 in Eugene, a difference of $205,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $950 in Tulsa versus $1,400 in Eugene.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Tulsa scores 95 while Eugene scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.
Healthcare costs in Tulsa (91) are lower than Eugene (106).
Median household income in Tulsa is $48,278 compared to $49,448 in Eugene. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Tulsa.
Relocating: Tulsa vs Eugene
If you are considering a move between Tulsa (index: 85) and Eugene (index: 115), the 26% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Tulsa is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.
Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Tulsa can afford $1,126/month, while the median household in Eugene can afford $1,154/month. With median homes at $175,000 in Tulsa versus $380,000 in Eugene, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.
Renting vs buying: At $950/month in Tulsa and $1,400/month in Eugene, renters save significantly in Tulsa. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.
Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Tulsa where costs are 15% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.
Reading These Numbers: Tulsa (85) vs Eugene (115)
The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Tulsa at 85 is 15% below the US average, while Eugene at 115 is 15% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.
Eugene costs meaningfully more than Tulsa, with a 30-point composite gap that translates to real differences in rent, groceries, and daily expenses. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Tulsa scores 63 and Eugene scores 130. That 67-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Tulsa with indices of 63 versus 130. Median home prices of $175,000 in Tulsa and $380,000 in Eugene underscore this gap. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Tulsa has an edge in housing and groceries, while Eugene is more affordable for utilities. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.
For renters: With median rents of $950/month in Tulsa and $1,400/month in Eugene, the annual rent difference is approximately $5,400. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $27,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.
For homebuyers: The $205,000 difference in median home prices between Tulsa and Eugene translates to roughly $12,300 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.
๐ Related Tools
๐ Moving & Relocation Resources
Amazon affiliate links