Tulsa vs Bakersfield

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Oklahoma salaries · California salaries

Living in Tulsa vs Bakersfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Tulsa has a housing index of 63 while Bakersfield sits at 96 (national average = 100). The median home in Tulsa costs $175,000 compared to $310,000 in Bakersfield, a difference of $135,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $950 in Tulsa versus $1,200 in Bakersfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Tulsa scores 95 while Bakersfield scores 100. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Tulsa (91) are lower than Bakersfield (99).

Median household income in Tulsa is $48,278 compared to $57,548 in Bakersfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Tulsa.

Relocating: Tulsa vs Bakersfield

If you are considering a move between Tulsa (index: 85) and Bakersfield (index: 101), the 16% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Tulsa is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Tulsa can afford $1,126/month, while the median household in Bakersfield can afford $1,343/month. With median homes at $175,000 in Tulsa versus $310,000 in Bakersfield, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $950/month in Tulsa and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Tulsa where costs are 15% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Tulsa (85) vs Bakersfield (101)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Tulsa at 85 is 15% below the US average, while Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

Bakersfield costs meaningfully more than Tulsa, with a 16-point composite gap that translates to real differences in rent, groceries, and daily expenses. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Tulsa scores 63 and Bakersfield scores 96. That 33-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Tulsa with indices of 63 versus 96. Median home prices of $175,000 in Tulsa and $310,000 in Bakersfield underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $950/month in Tulsa and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, the annual rent difference is approximately $3,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $15,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $135,000 difference in median home prices between Tulsa and Bakersfield translates to roughly $8,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links