๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

St. Paul vs Stockton

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

St. Paul

Minnesota
100
Average
$260,000
Median Home
$1,300/mo
Median Rent
$57,718
Median Income

Stockton

California
114
Above Average
$400,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$54,658
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

12% cheaper
St. Paul is 12% more affordable than Stockton. A $75,000 salary in Stockton is equivalent to $65,789 in St. Paul.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
98
St. Paul
126
Stockton
Groceries
103
St. Paul
101
Stockton
Utilities
97
St. Paul
108
Stockton
Transportation
108
St. Paul
111
Stockton
Healthcare
105
St. Paul
101
Stockton

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$85,500
$75K in St. Paul โ†’ Stockton
$65,789
$75K in Stockton โ†’ St. Paul

See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries ยท California salaries

Living in St. Paul vs Stockton

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. St. Paul has a housing index of 98 while Stockton sits at 126 (national average = 100). The median home in St. Paul costs $260,000 compared to $400,000 in Stockton, a difference of $140,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,300 in St. Paul versus $1,500 in Stockton.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: St. Paul scores 103 while Stockton scores 101. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in St. Paul (105) are higher than Stockton (101). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in St. Paul is $57,718 compared to $54,658 in Stockton. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in St. Paul.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links