St. Paul vs Seattle
Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
St. Paul
Seattle
💡 The Verdict
34% cheaper
St. Paul is 34% more affordable than Seattle. A $75,000 salary in Seattle is equivalent to $49,342 in St. Paul.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
💰 Salary Equivalence
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · Washington salaries
Living in St. Paul vs Seattle
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. St. Paul has a housing index of 98 while Seattle sits at 224 (national average = 100). The median home in St. Paul costs $260,000 compared to $750,000 in Seattle, a difference of $490,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,300 in St. Paul versus $2,300 in Seattle.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: St. Paul scores 103 while Seattle scores 109.
Healthcare costs in St. Paul (105) are lower than Seattle (109).
Median household income in St. Paul is $57,718 compared to $97,185 in Seattle. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in St. Paul.
Relocating: St. Paul vs Seattle
If you are considering a move between St. Paul (index: 100) and Seattle (index: 152), the 34% cost difference has real implications for your budget. St. Paul is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.
Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in St. Paul can afford $1,347/month, while the median household in Seattle can afford $2,268/month. With median homes at $260,000 in St. Paul versus $750,000 in Seattle, the higher-cost city presents significant affordability challenges.
Renting vs buying: At $1,300/month in St. Paul and $2,300/month in Seattle, renters save significantly in St. Paul. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.
Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in St. Paul. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.
Reading These Numbers: St. Paul (100) vs Seattle (152)
The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. St. Paul at 100 is 0% below the US average, while Seattle at 152 is 52% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.
The 52-point spread between Seattle (152) and St. Paul (100) is large enough to reshape a household budget entirely, especially for single-income families. The biggest category divergence is housing, where St. Paul scores 98 and Seattle scores 224. That 126-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors St. Paul with indices of 98 versus 224. Median home prices of $260,000 in St. Paul and $750,000 in Seattle underscore this gap.
For renters: With median rents of $1,300/month in St. Paul and $2,300/month in Seattle, the annual rent difference is approximately $12,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $60,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.
For homebuyers: The $490,000 difference in median home prices between St. Paul and Seattle translates to roughly $29,400 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.
🔗 Related Tools
📚 Moving & Relocation Resources
Amazon affiliate links