St. Paul vs San Francisco

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · California salaries

Living in St. Paul vs San Francisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. St. Paul has a housing index of 98 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in St. Paul costs $260,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $940,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,300 in St. Paul versus $3,400 in San Francisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: St. Paul scores 103 while San Francisco scores 112.

Healthcare costs in St. Paul (105) are lower than San Francisco (113).

Median household income in St. Paul is $57,718 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in St. Paul.

Relocating: St. Paul vs San Francisco

If you are considering a move between St. Paul (index: 100) and San Francisco (index: 190), the 47% cost difference has real implications for your budget. St. Paul is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in St. Paul can afford $1,347/month, while the median household in San Francisco can afford $2,780/month. With median homes at $260,000 in St. Paul versus $1,200,000 in San Francisco, the higher-cost city presents significant affordability challenges.

Renting vs buying: At $1,300/month in St. Paul and $3,400/month in San Francisco, renters save significantly in St. Paul. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in St. Paul. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: St. Paul (100) vs San Francisco (190)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. St. Paul at 100 is 0% below the US average, while San Francisco at 190 is 90% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

The 90-point spread between San Francisco (190) and St. Paul (100) is large enough to reshape a household budget entirely, especially for single-income families. The biggest category divergence is housing, where St. Paul scores 98 and San Francisco scores 327. That 229-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors St. Paul with indices of 98 versus 327. Median home prices of $260,000 in St. Paul and $1,200,000 in San Francisco underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $1,300/month in St. Paul and $3,400/month in San Francisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $25,200. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $126,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $940,000 difference in median home prices between St. Paul and San Francisco translates to roughly $56,400 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links