St. Louis vs Omaha

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Missouri salaries · Nebraska salaries

Living in St. Louis vs Omaha

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. St. Louis has a housing index of 72 while Omaha sits at 76 (national average = 100). The median home in St. Louis costs $175,000 compared to $230,000 in Omaha, a difference of $55,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,000 in St. Louis versus $1,100 in Omaha.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: St. Louis scores 97 while Omaha scores 97. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in St. Louis (95) are lower than Omaha (96). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in St. Louis is $45,782 compared to $59,612 in Omaha. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

Relocating: St. Louis vs Omaha

If you are considering a move between St. Louis (index: 90) and Omaha (index: 90), the 0% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Omaha is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in St. Louis can afford $1,068/month, while the median household in Omaha can afford $1,391/month. With median homes at $175,000 in St. Louis versus $230,000 in Omaha, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,000/month in St. Louis and $1,100/month in Omaha, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Omaha where costs are 10% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: St. Louis (90) vs Omaha (90)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. St. Louis at 90 is 10% below the US average, while Omaha at 90 is 10% below average. Both cities are relatively affordable compared to the national average.

St. Louis and Omaha land within 0 points of each other on the composite index (90 vs 90), so the overall cost picture is similar. Housing shows the widest single-category margin at 72 versus 76, making it the area where residents will feel the most day-to-day price difference between St. Louis and Omaha. Housing costs are comparable between the two metros, with St. Louis at 72 and Omaha at 76 on the housing sub-index and median home prices of $175,000 and $230,000 respectively. Neither city is cheaper across the board: St. Louis has an edge in housing and healthcare, while Omaha is more affordable for utilities and transportation. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,000/month in St. Louis and $1,100/month in Omaha, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,200. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $6,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $55,000 difference in median home prices between St. Louis and Omaha translates to roughly $3,300 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links