Sioux Falls vs Mesa

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: South Dakota salaries · Arizona salaries

Living in Sioux Falls vs Mesa

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Sioux Falls has a housing index of 80 while Mesa sits at 98 (national average = 100). The median home in Sioux Falls costs $265,000 compared to $350,000 in Mesa, a difference of $85,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,100 in Sioux Falls versus $1,350 in Mesa.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Sioux Falls scores 97 while Mesa scores 99. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Sioux Falls (101) are higher than Mesa (95). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Sioux Falls is $61,714 compared to $60,234 in Mesa. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Sioux Falls.

Relocating: Sioux Falls vs Mesa

If you are considering a move between Sioux Falls (index: 93) and Mesa (index: 99), the 6% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Sioux Falls is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Sioux Falls can afford $1,440/month, while the median household in Mesa can afford $1,405/month. With median homes at $265,000 in Sioux Falls versus $350,000 in Mesa, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.

Renting vs buying: At $1,100/month in Sioux Falls and $1,350/month in Mesa, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Sioux Falls where costs are 7% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Sioux Falls (93) vs Mesa (99)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Sioux Falls at 93 is 7% below the US average, while Mesa at 99 is 1% below average. Both cities are close to the national average in overall costs.

A 6-point index spread separates Mesa from Sioux Falls, a moderate gap that adds up across monthly bills but is manageable with a typical dual-income household budget. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Sioux Falls scores 80 and Mesa scores 98. That 18-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Sioux Falls with indices of 80 versus 98. Median home prices of $265,000 in Sioux Falls and $350,000 in Mesa underscore this gap. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Sioux Falls has an edge in housing and groceries, while Mesa is more affordable for healthcare. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,100/month in Sioux Falls and $1,350/month in Mesa, the annual rent difference is approximately $3,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $15,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $85,000 difference in median home prices between Sioux Falls and Mesa translates to roughly $5,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links