Sacramento vs Missoula

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: California salaries · Montana salaries

Living in Sacramento vs Missoula

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Sacramento has a housing index of 163 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Sacramento costs $450,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $10,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Sacramento versus $1,400 in Missoula.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Sacramento scores 104 while Missoula scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Sacramento (106) are higher than Missoula (102). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Sacramento is $64,660 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.

Relocating: Sacramento vs Missoula

If you are considering a move between Sacramento (index: 128) and Missoula (index: 115), the 10% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Missoula is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Sacramento can afford $1,509/month, while the median household in Missoula can afford $1,149/month. With median homes at $450,000 in Sacramento versus $460,000 in Missoula, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.

Renting vs buying: At $1,700/month in Sacramento and $1,400/month in Missoula, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Missoula. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Sacramento (128) vs Missoula (115)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Sacramento at 128 is 28% above the US average, while Missoula at 115 is 15% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

A 13-point index spread separates Sacramento from Missoula, a moderate gap that adds up across monthly bills but is manageable with a typical dual-income household budget. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Sacramento scores 163 and Missoula scores 141. That 22-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Missoula with indices of 141 versus 163. Median home prices of $450,000 in Sacramento and $460,000 in Missoula underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/month in Sacramento and $1,400/month in Missoula, the annual rent difference is approximately $3,600. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $18,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $10,000 difference in median home prices between Sacramento and Missoula translates to roughly $600 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links