⚖️ City Comparison

Rochester vs Tulsa

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Rochester

Minnesota
90
Below Average
$220,000
Median Home
$860/mo
Median Rent
$47,300
Median Income

Tulsa

Oklahoma
85
Very Affordable
$175,000
Median Home
$950/mo
Median Rent
$48,278
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

6% Cheaper

Tulsa is 6% cheaper than Rochester overall. A $75,000 salary in Rochester is equivalent to $70,833 in Tulsa.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Rochester (left) vs Tulsa (right). National average = 100.

Housing
70
Housing
63
Groceries
88
Groceries
95
Utilities
92
Utilities
92
Transportation
87
Transportation
98
Healthcare
85
Healthcare
91

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Rochester versus Tulsa. Differences shown from Rochester perspective.

ItemRochesterTulsaDifference
1-Bed Rent$640/mo$710/mo$-70.00
2-Bed Rent$860/mo$950/mo$-90.00
3-Bed Rent$1,210/mo$1,260/mo$-50.00
Bread (loaf)$2.64$2.80$-0.16
Milk (gallon)$3.42$3.47$-0.05
Eggs (dozen)$2.66$3.03$-0.37
Coffee (latte)$5.16$5.24$-0.08
Gas (gallon)$3.00$3.35$-0.35
Restaurant Meal$15.82$13.48+$2.34

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Rochester has the same purchasing power as $70,833 in Tulsa.

Conversely, $75,000 in Tulsa equals $79,412 in Rochester.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$52,537
Rochester (Minnesota)
$54,487
Tulsa (Oklahoma)

The $1950 difference is driven by Minnesota having a higher state income tax rate. Minnesota details → · Oklahoma details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
90 vs 85

Reading These Numbers: Rochester (90) vs Tulsa (85)

Rochester at 90 is 10% below the US average, while Tulsa at 85 is 15% below average. The cost difference between these cities is relatively modest.

In Rochester, the composite index of 90 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 70, followed by groceries (88), utilities (92), transportation (87), and healthcare (85). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $860/mo in Rochester and $950/mo in Tulsa, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,080.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $5,400.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $45,000.0 difference in median home prices between Rochester and Tulsa translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Rochester vs Tulsa

Choosing between Rochester and Tulsa involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Beyond the numbers shown above, quality of life differences between Rochester and Tulsa can meaningfully affect your financial picture in ways the index does not capture. Commute time translates to fuel costs and vehicle depreciation. Climate affects utility bills seasonally. Access to public parks and free cultural venues reduces entertainment spending. Consider these secondary financial effects alongside the direct cost comparisons when making your final decision.