Reno vs Bakersfield

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Nevada salaries · California salaries

Living in Reno vs Bakersfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Reno has a housing index of 133 while Bakersfield sits at 96 (national average = 100). The median home in Reno costs $450,000 compared to $310,000 in Bakersfield, a difference of $140,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,600 in Reno versus $1,200 in Bakersfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Reno scores 102 while Bakersfield scores 100. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Reno (96) are lower than Bakersfield (99). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Reno is $61,648 compared to $57,548 in Bakersfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Bakersfield.

Relocating: Reno vs Bakersfield

If you are considering a move between Reno (index: 111) and Bakersfield (index: 101), the 9% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Bakersfield is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Reno can afford $1,438/month, while the median household in Bakersfield can afford $1,343/month. With median homes at $450,000 in Reno versus $310,000 in Bakersfield, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.

Renting vs buying: At $1,600/month in Reno and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, renters save significantly in Bakersfield. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Bakersfield. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Reno (111) vs Bakersfield (101)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Reno at 111 is 11% above the US average, while Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

A 10-point index spread separates Reno from Bakersfield, a moderate gap that adds up across monthly bills but is manageable with a typical dual-income household budget. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Reno scores 133 and Bakersfield scores 96. That 37-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Bakersfield with indices of 96 versus 133. Median home prices of $450,000 in Reno and $310,000 in Bakersfield underscore this gap. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Reno has an edge in utilities and transportation, while Bakersfield is more affordable for housing and groceries. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,600/month in Reno and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, the annual rent difference is approximately $4,800. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $24,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $140,000 difference in median home prices between Reno and Bakersfield translates to roughly $8,400 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links