๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Omaha vs Worcester

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Omaha

Nebraska
90
Below Average
$230,000
Median Home
$1,100/mo
Median Rent
$59,612
Median Income

Worcester

Massachusetts
125
Expensive
$340,000
Median Home
$1,600/mo
Median Rent
$52,228
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

28% cheaper
Omaha is 28% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $54,000 in Omaha.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
76
Omaha
152
Worcester
Groceries
97
Omaha
106
Worcester
Utilities
93
Omaha
122
Worcester
Transportation
100
Omaha
103
Worcester
Healthcare
96
Omaha
115
Worcester

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$104,167
$75K in Omaha โ†’ Worcester
$54,000
$75K in Worcester โ†’ Omaha

See exact take-home pay: Nebraska salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in Omaha vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Omaha has a housing index of 76 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Omaha costs $230,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $110,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,100 in Omaha versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Omaha scores 97 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in Omaha (96) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in Omaha is $59,612 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Omaha.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links