๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Omaha vs Springfield

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Omaha

Nebraska
90
Below Average
$230,000
Median Home
$1,100/mo
Median Rent
$59,612
Median Income

Springfield

Massachusetts
107
Above Average
$230,000
Median Home
$1,200/mo
Median Rent
$41,612
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

16% cheaper
Omaha is 16% more affordable than Springfield. A $75,000 salary in Springfield is equivalent to $63,084 in Omaha.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
76
Omaha
106
Springfield
Groceries
97
Omaha
104
Springfield
Utilities
93
Omaha
119
Springfield
Transportation
100
Omaha
101
Springfield
Healthcare
96
Omaha
114
Springfield

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$89,167
$75K in Omaha โ†’ Springfield
$63,084
$75K in Springfield โ†’ Omaha

See exact take-home pay: Nebraska salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in Omaha vs Springfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Omaha has a housing index of 76 while Springfield sits at 106 (national average = 100). The median home in Omaha costs $230,000 compared to $230,000 in Springfield, a difference of $0. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,100 in Omaha versus $1,200 in Springfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Omaha scores 97 while Springfield scores 104. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Omaha (96) are lower than Springfield (114).

Median household income in Omaha is $59,612 compared to $41,612 in Springfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Omaha.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links