Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
7% cheaper
Oklahoma City is 7% more affordable than Rochester. A $75,000 salary in Rochester is equivalent to $69,415 in Oklahoma City.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Oklahoma salaries · New York salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Oklahoma City has a housing index of 68 while Rochester sits at 73 (national average = 100). The median home in Oklahoma City costs $195,000 compared to $155,000 in Rochester, a difference of $40,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,000 in Oklahoma City versus $1,000 in Rochester.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Oklahoma City scores 95 while Rochester scores 101. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.
Healthcare costs in Oklahoma City (92) are lower than Rochester (100).
Median household income in Oklahoma City is $55,458 compared to $39,728 in Rochester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Oklahoma City.
Amazon affiliate links