⚖️ City Comparison

Nashua vs San Francisco

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Nashua

New Hampshire
122
Expensive
$355,000
Median Home
$1,590/mo
Median Rent
$73,900
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Extremely Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

36% Cheaper

Nashua is 36% cheaper than San Francisco overall. A $75,000 salary in Nashua is equivalent to $116,803 in San Francisco.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Nashua (left) vs San Francisco (right). National average = 100.

Housing
113
Housing
327
Groceries
120
Groceries
112
Utilities
115
Utilities
126
Transportation
125
Transportation
113
Healthcare
121
Healthcare
113

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Nashua versus San Francisco. Differences shown from Nashua perspective.

ItemNashuaSan FranciscoDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,190/mo$2,370/mo$-1180.00
2-Bed Rent$1,590/mo$3,400/mo$-1810.00
3-Bed Rent$2,080/mo$4,530/mo$-2450.00
Bread (loaf)$3.70$3.13+$0.57
Milk (gallon)$5.00$4.60+$0.40
Eggs (dozen)$3.95$3.50+$0.45
Coffee (latte)$6.70$6.26+$0.44
Gas (gallon)$3.92$3.66+$0.26
Restaurant Meal$21.50$26.09$-4.59

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Nashua has the same purchasing power as $116,803 in San Francisco.

Conversely, $75,000 in San Francisco equals $48,158 in Nashua.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$57,638
Nashua (New Hampshire)
$52,987
San Francisco (California)

The $4651 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. New Hampshire details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
122 vs 190

Reading These Numbers: Nashua (122) vs San Francisco (190)

Nashua at 122 is 22% above the US average, while San Francisco at 190 is 90% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Nashua, the composite index of 122 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 113, followed by groceries (120), utilities (115), transportation (125), and healthcare (121). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,590/mo in Nashua and $3,400/mo in San Francisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $21,720.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $108,600.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $845,000.0 difference in median home prices between Nashua and San Francisco translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Nashua vs San Francisco

Choosing between Nashua and San Francisco involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Beyond the numbers shown above, quality of life differences between Nashua and San Francisco can meaningfully affect your financial picture in ways the index does not capture. Commute time translates to fuel costs and vehicle depreciation. Climate affects utility bills seasonally. Access to public parks and free cultural venues reduces entertainment spending. Consider these secondary financial effects alongside the direct cost comparisons when making your final decision.