Naperville vs Worcester

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries · Massachusetts salaries

Living in Naperville vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Naperville has a housing index of 130 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Naperville costs $430,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $90,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,800 in Naperville versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Naperville scores 104 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in Naperville (101) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in Naperville is $118,254 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Naperville.

Relocating: Naperville vs Worcester

If you are considering a move between Naperville (index: 112) and Worcester (index: 125), the 10% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Naperville is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Naperville can afford $2,759/month, while the median household in Worcester can afford $1,219/month. With median homes at $430,000 in Naperville versus $340,000 in Worcester, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.

Renting vs buying: At $1,800/month in Naperville and $1,600/month in Worcester, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Naperville. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Naperville (112) vs Worcester (125)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Naperville at 112 is 12% above the US average, while Worcester at 125 is 25% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly — one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.

For renters: With median rents of $1,800/month in Naperville and $1,600/month in Worcester, the annual rent difference is approximately $2,400. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $12,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $90,000 difference in median home prices between Naperville and Worcester translates to roughly $5,400 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links