⚖️ City Comparison

Nampa vs San Francisco

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Nampa

Idaho
94
Below Average
$265,000
Median Home
$1,340/mo
Median Rent
$58,500
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Extremely Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

51% Cheaper

Nampa is 51% cheaper than San Francisco overall. A $75,000 salary in Nampa is equivalent to $151,596 in San Francisco.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Nampa (left) vs San Francisco (right). National average = 100.

Housing
90
Housing
327
Groceries
85
Groceries
112
Utilities
94
Utilities
126
Transportation
89
Transportation
113
Healthcare
87
Healthcare
113

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Nampa versus San Francisco. Differences shown from Nampa perspective.

ItemNampaSan FranciscoDifference
1-Bed Rent$940/mo$2,370/mo$-1430.00
2-Bed Rent$1,340/mo$3,400/mo$-2060.00
3-Bed Rent$1,750/mo$4,530/mo$-2780.00
Bread (loaf)$2.23$3.13$-0.90
Milk (gallon)$3.37$4.60$-1.23
Eggs (dozen)$2.85$3.50$-0.65
Coffee (latte)$5.26$6.26$-1.00
Gas (gallon)$2.89$3.66$-0.77
Restaurant Meal$16.33$26.09$-9.76

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Nampa has the same purchasing power as $151,596 in San Francisco.

Conversely, $75,000 in San Francisco equals $37,105 in Nampa.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$53,287
Nampa (Idaho)
$52,987
San Francisco (California)

The $300 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. Idaho details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
94 vs 190

Reading These Numbers: Nampa (94) vs San Francisco (190)

Nampa at 94 is 6% below the US average, while San Francisco at 190 is 90% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Nampa, the composite index of 94 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 90, followed by groceries (85), utilities (94), transportation (89), and healthcare (87). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,340/mo in Nampa and $3,400/mo in San Francisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $24,720.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $123,600.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $935,000.0 difference in median home prices between Nampa and San Francisco translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Nampa vs San Francisco

Choosing between Nampa and San Francisco involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Long-term affordability in Nampa versus San Francisco depends partly on cost trajectory. Cities experiencing rapid population growth tend to see costs rise faster than established metros where supply has caught up with demand. While our index captures current conditions, consider whether the city trending cheaper today might converge toward average over the next five to ten years as more people discover it. Our quarterly updates help track these shifts over time.