๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

San Francisco vs Murfreesboro

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

Murfreesboro

Tennessee
93
Below Average
$325,000
Median Home
$1,350/mo
Median Rent
$55,200
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

51% cheaper
Murfreesboro is 51% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $36,711 in Murfreesboro.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
327
San Francisc
85
Murfreesboro
Groceries
112
San Francisc
95
Murfreesboro
Utilities
126
San Francisc
89
Murfreesboro
Transportation
113
San Francisc
97
Murfreesboro
Healthcare
113
San Francisc
96
Murfreesboro

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$36,711
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Murfreesboro
$153,226
$75K in Murfreesboro โ†’ San Francisco

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท Tennessee salaries

Living in San Francisco vs Murfreesboro

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. San Francisco has a housing index of 327 while Murfreesboro sits at 85 (national average = 100). The median home in San Francisco costs $1,200,000 compared to $325,000 in Murfreesboro, a difference of $875,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $3,400 in San Francisco versus $1,350 in Murfreesboro.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: San Francisco scores 112 while Murfreesboro scores 95.

Healthcare costs in San Francisco (113) are higher than Murfreesboro (96).

Median household income in San Francisco is $119,136 compared to $55,200 in Murfreesboro. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Murfreesboro.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links