Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
8% cheaper
Missoula is 8% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $69,000 in Missoula.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Montana salaries · Massachusetts salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Missoula has a housing index of 141 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Missoula costs $460,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $120,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Missoula versus $1,600 in Worcester.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Missoula scores 103 while Worcester scores 106.
Healthcare costs in Missoula (102) are lower than Worcester (115).
Median household income in Missoula is $49,234 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.
Amazon affiliate links