๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Missoula vs Stockton

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

Stockton

California
114
Above Average
$400,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$54,658
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

Missoula and Stockton have very similar costs of living, with less than a 3% difference overall.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
141
Missoula
126
Stockton
Groceries
103
Missoula
101
Stockton
Utilities
89
Missoula
108
Stockton
Transportation
101
Missoula
111
Stockton
Healthcare
102
Missoula
101
Stockton

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$74,348
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Stockton
$75,658
$75K in Stockton โ†’ Missoula

See exact take-home pay: Montana salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Missoula vs Stockton

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Missoula has a housing index of 141 while Stockton sits at 126 (national average = 100). The median home in Missoula costs $460,000 compared to $400,000 in Stockton, a difference of $60,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Missoula versus $1,500 in Stockton.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Missoula scores 103 while Stockton scores 101. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Missoula (102) are higher than Stockton (101). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Missoula is $49,234 compared to $54,658 in Stockton. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links