๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Missoula vs Springfield

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

Springfield

Massachusetts
107
Above Average
$230,000
Median Home
$1,200/mo
Median Rent
$41,612
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

7% cheaper
Springfield is 7% more affordable than Missoula. A $75,000 salary in Missoula is equivalent to $69,783 in Springfield.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
141
Missoula
106
Springfield
Groceries
103
Missoula
104
Springfield
Utilities
89
Missoula
119
Springfield
Transportation
101
Missoula
101
Springfield
Healthcare
102
Missoula
114
Springfield

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$69,783
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Springfield
$80,607
$75K in Springfield โ†’ Missoula

See exact take-home pay: Montana salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in Missoula vs Springfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Missoula has a housing index of 141 while Springfield sits at 106 (national average = 100). The median home in Missoula costs $460,000 compared to $230,000 in Springfield, a difference of $230,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Missoula versus $1,200 in Springfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Missoula scores 103 while Springfield scores 104. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Missoula (102) are lower than Springfield (114).

Median household income in Missoula is $49,234 compared to $41,612 in Springfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Springfield.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links