๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Missoula vs Riverside

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

Riverside

California
128
Expensive
$500,000
Median Home
$1,800/mo
Median Rent
$67,068
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

10% cheaper
Missoula is 10% more affordable than Riverside. A $75,000 salary in Riverside is equivalent to $67,383 in Missoula.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
141
Missoula
155
Riverside
Groceries
103
Missoula
103
Riverside
Utilities
89
Missoula
111
Riverside
Transportation
101
Missoula
114
Riverside
Healthcare
102
Missoula
102
Riverside

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$83,478
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Riverside
$67,383
$75K in Riverside โ†’ Missoula

See exact take-home pay: Montana salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Missoula vs Riverside

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Missoula has a housing index of 141 while Riverside sits at 155 (national average = 100). The median home in Missoula costs $460,000 compared to $500,000 in Riverside, a difference of $40,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Missoula versus $1,800 in Riverside.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Missoula scores 103 while Riverside scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Missoula (102) match Riverside (102). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Missoula is $49,234 compared to $67,068 in Riverside. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links