Minneapolis vs Worcester

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · Massachusetts salaries

Living in Minneapolis vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Minneapolis has a housing index of 112 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Minneapolis costs $310,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $30,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,500 in Minneapolis versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Minneapolis scores 104 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in Minneapolis (105) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in Minneapolis is $64,285 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Minneapolis.

Relocating: Minneapolis vs Worcester

If you are considering a move between Minneapolis (index: 106) and Worcester (index: 125), the 15% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Minneapolis is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Minneapolis can afford $1,500/month, while the median household in Worcester can afford $1,219/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Minneapolis versus $340,000 in Worcester, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,500/month in Minneapolis and $1,600/month in Worcester, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Minneapolis. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Minneapolis (106) vs Worcester (125)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Minneapolis at 106 is 6% above the US average, while Worcester at 125 is 25% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly — one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.

For renters: With median rents of $1,500/month in Minneapolis and $1,600/month in Worcester, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,200. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $6,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $30,000 difference in median home prices between Minneapolis and Worcester translates to roughly $1,800 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links