Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
8% cheaper
Minneapolis is 8% more affordable than Missoula. A $75,000 salary in Missoula is equivalent to $69,130 in Minneapolis.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · Montana salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Minneapolis has a housing index of 112 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Minneapolis costs $310,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $150,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,500 in Minneapolis versus $1,400 in Missoula.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Minneapolis scores 104 while Missoula scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.
Healthcare costs in Minneapolis (105) are higher than Missoula (102). Both are close to the national average.
Median household income in Minneapolis is $64,285 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Minneapolis.
Amazon affiliate links