Milwaukee vs Tulsa

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Wisconsin salaries · Oklahoma salaries

Living in Milwaukee vs Tulsa

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Milwaukee has a housing index of 80 while Tulsa sits at 63 (national average = 100). The median home in Milwaukee costs $175,000 compared to $175,000 in Tulsa, a difference of $0. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,100 in Milwaukee versus $950 in Tulsa.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Milwaukee scores 100 while Tulsa scores 95. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Milwaukee (102) are higher than Tulsa (91).

Median household income in Milwaukee is $44,044 compared to $48,278 in Tulsa. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Tulsa.

Relocating: Milwaukee vs Tulsa

If you are considering a move between Milwaukee (index: 92) and Tulsa (index: 85), the 8% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Tulsa is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Milwaukee can afford $1,028/month, while the median household in Tulsa can afford $1,126/month. With median homes at $175,000 in Milwaukee versus $175,000 in Tulsa, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,100/month in Milwaukee and $950/month in Tulsa, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Tulsa where costs are 15% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Milwaukee (92) vs Tulsa (85)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Milwaukee at 92 is 8% below the US average, while Tulsa at 85 is 15% below average. Both cities are relatively affordable compared to the national average.

The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly — one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.

For renters: With median rents of $1,100/month in Milwaukee and $950/month in Tulsa, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,800. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $9,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $0 difference in median home prices between Milwaukee and Tulsa translates to roughly $0 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links