Milwaukee vs Fargo

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Wisconsin salaries · North Dakota salaries

Living in Milwaukee vs Fargo

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Milwaukee has a housing index of 80 while Fargo sits at 80 (national average = 100). The median home in Milwaukee costs $175,000 compared to $260,000 in Fargo, a difference of $85,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,100 in Milwaukee versus $1,000 in Fargo.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Milwaukee scores 100 while Fargo scores 98. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Milwaukee (102) are lower than Fargo (105). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Milwaukee is $44,044 compared to $55,218 in Fargo. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

Relocating: Milwaukee vs Fargo

If you are considering a move between Milwaukee (index: 92) and Fargo (index: 93), the 1% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Milwaukee is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Milwaukee can afford $1,028/month, while the median household in Fargo can afford $1,288/month. With median homes at $175,000 in Milwaukee versus $260,000 in Fargo, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,100/month in Milwaukee and $1,000/month in Fargo, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Milwaukee where costs are 8% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Milwaukee (92) vs Fargo (93)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Milwaukee at 92 is 8% below the US average, while Fargo at 93 is 7% below average. Both cities are relatively affordable compared to the national average.

Milwaukee and Fargo land within 1 points of each other on the composite index (92 vs 93), so the overall cost picture is similar. Utilities shows the widest single-category margin at 97 versus 92, making it the area where residents will feel the most day-to-day price difference between Milwaukee and Fargo. Housing costs are comparable between the two metros, with Milwaukee at 80 and Fargo at 80 on the housing sub-index and median home prices of $175,000 and $260,000 respectively. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Milwaukee has an edge in healthcare, while Fargo is more affordable for groceries and utilities. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,100/month in Milwaukee and $1,000/month in Fargo, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,200. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $6,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $85,000 difference in median home prices between Milwaukee and Fargo translates to roughly $5,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links