๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Los Angeles vs Worcester

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Los Angeles

California
166
Very Expensive
$850,000
Median Home
$2,700/mo
Median Rent
$65,290
Median Income

Worcester

Massachusetts
125
Expensive
$340,000
Median Home
$1,600/mo
Median Rent
$52,228
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

25% cheaper
Worcester is 25% more affordable than Los Angeles. A $75,000 salary in Los Angeles is equivalent to $56,476 in Worcester.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
262
Los Angeles
152
Worcester
Groceries
107
Los Angeles
106
Worcester
Utilities
114
Los Angeles
122
Worcester
Transportation
118
Los Angeles
103
Worcester
Healthcare
103
Los Angeles
115
Worcester

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$56,476
$75K in Los Angeles โ†’ Worcester
$99,600
$75K in Worcester โ†’ Los Angeles

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in Los Angeles vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Los Angeles has a housing index of 262 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Los Angeles costs $850,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $510,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,700 in Los Angeles versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Los Angeles scores 107 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in Los Angeles (103) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in Los Angeles is $65,290 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Worcester.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links