Los Angeles vs Frisco

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: California salaries · Texas salaries

Living in Los Angeles vs Frisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Los Angeles has a housing index of 262 while Frisco sits at 142 (national average = 100). The median home in Los Angeles costs $850,000 compared to $500,000 in Frisco, a difference of $350,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,700 in Los Angeles versus $1,900 in Frisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Los Angeles scores 107 while Frisco scores 99.

Healthcare costs in Los Angeles (103) are higher than Frisco (100). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Los Angeles is $65,290 compared to $126,048 in Frisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Frisco.

Relocating: Los Angeles vs Frisco

If you are considering a move between Los Angeles (index: 166) and Frisco (index: 115), the 31% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Frisco is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Los Angeles can afford $1,523/month, while the median household in Frisco can afford $2,941/month. With median homes at $850,000 in Los Angeles versus $500,000 in Frisco, the higher-cost city presents significant affordability challenges.

Renting vs buying: At $2,700/month in Los Angeles and $1,900/month in Frisco, renters save significantly in Frisco. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Frisco. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Los Angeles (166) vs Frisco (115)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Los Angeles at 166 is 66% above the US average, while Frisco at 115 is 15% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

The 51-point spread between Los Angeles (166) and Frisco (115) is large enough to reshape a household budget entirely, especially for single-income families. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Los Angeles scores 262 and Frisco scores 142. That 120-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Frisco with indices of 142 versus 262. Median home prices of $850,000 in Los Angeles and $500,000 in Frisco underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $2,700/month in Los Angeles and $1,900/month in Frisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $9,600. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $48,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $350,000 difference in median home prices between Los Angeles and Frisco translates to roughly $21,000 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links