⚖️ City Comparison

Lincoln vs San Francisco

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Lincoln

Nebraska
90
Below Average
$259,000
Median Home
$1,090/mo
Median Rent
$56,600
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Extremely Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

53% Cheaper

Lincoln is 53% cheaper than San Francisco overall. A $75,000 salary in Lincoln is equivalent to $158,333 in San Francisco.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Lincoln (left) vs San Francisco (right). National average = 100.

Housing
82
Housing
327
Groceries
93
Groceries
112
Utilities
84
Utilities
126
Transportation
84
Transportation
113
Healthcare
91
Healthcare
113

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Lincoln versus San Francisco. Differences shown from Lincoln perspective.

ItemLincolnSan FranciscoDifference
1-Bed Rent$780/mo$2,370/mo$-1590.00
2-Bed Rent$1,090/mo$3,400/mo$-2310.00
3-Bed Rent$1,420/mo$4,530/mo$-3110.00
Bread (loaf)$2.46$3.13$-0.67
Milk (gallon)$3.64$4.60$-0.96
Eggs (dozen)$3.00$3.50$-0.50
Coffee (latte)$5.18$6.26$-1.08
Gas (gallon)$3.08$3.66$-0.58
Restaurant Meal$16.08$26.09$-10.01

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Lincoln has the same purchasing power as $158,333 in San Francisco.

Conversely, $75,000 in San Francisco equals $35,526 in Lincoln.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$53,437
Lincoln (Nebraska)
$52,987
San Francisco (California)

The $450 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. Nebraska details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
90 vs 190

Reading These Numbers: Lincoln (90) vs San Francisco (190)

Lincoln at 90 is 10% below the US average, while San Francisco at 190 is 90% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Lincoln, the composite index of 90 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 82, followed by groceries (93), utilities (84), transportation (84), and healthcare (91). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,090/mo in Lincoln and $3,400/mo in San Francisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $27,720.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $138,600.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $941,000.0 difference in median home prices between Lincoln and San Francisco translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Lincoln vs San Francisco

Choosing between Lincoln and San Francisco involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

The cost gap between Lincoln and San Francisco reflects thousands of individual pricing differences across housing markets, grocery chains, utility providers, and healthcare networks. No two households experience the same effective cost of living even in the same city, which is why the category breakdown matters more than the headline number. Adjust the lifestyle weighting sliders above to see how your spending priorities shift the comparison between these specific metros.