๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Honolulu vs Missoula

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Honolulu

Hawaii
186
Very Expensive
$720,000
Median Home
$2,400/mo
Median Rent
$71,465
Median Income

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

38% cheaper
Missoula is 38% more affordable than Honolulu. A $75,000 salary in Honolulu is equivalent to $46,371 in Missoula.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
275
Honolulu
141
Missoula
Groceries
138
Honolulu
103
Missoula
Utilities
159
Honolulu
89
Missoula
Transportation
114
Honolulu
101
Missoula
Healthcare
107
Honolulu
102
Missoula

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$46,371
$75K in Honolulu โ†’ Missoula
$121,304
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Honolulu

See exact take-home pay: Hawaii salaries ยท Montana salaries

Living in Honolulu vs Missoula

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Honolulu has a housing index of 275 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Honolulu costs $720,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $260,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,400 in Honolulu versus $1,400 in Missoula.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Honolulu scores 138 while Missoula scores 103.

Healthcare costs in Honolulu (107) are higher than Missoula (102). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Honolulu is $71,465 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links