๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Fort Lauderdale vs Missoula

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Fort Lauderdale

Florida
122
Expensive
$380,000
Median Home
$2,000/mo
Median Rent
$54,468
Median Income

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

6% cheaper
Missoula is 6% more affordable than Fort Lauderdale. A $75,000 salary in Fort Lauderdale is equivalent to $70,697 in Missoula.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
155
Fort Lauderd
141
Missoula
Groceries
106
Fort Lauderd
103
Missoula
Utilities
96
Fort Lauderd
89
Missoula
Transportation
108
Fort Lauderd
101
Missoula
Healthcare
99
Fort Lauderd
102
Missoula

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$70,697
$75K in Fort Lauderdale โ†’ Missoula
$79,565
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Fort Lauderdale

See exact take-home pay: Florida salaries ยท Montana salaries

Living in Fort Lauderdale vs Missoula

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Fort Lauderdale has a housing index of 155 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Fort Lauderdale costs $380,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $80,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,000 in Fort Lauderdale versus $1,400 in Missoula.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Fort Lauderdale scores 106 while Missoula scores 103.

Healthcare costs in Fort Lauderdale (99) are lower than Missoula (102). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Fort Lauderdale is $54,468 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links