Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
26% cheaper
Fargo is 26% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $55,800 in Fargo.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: North Dakota salaries · Massachusetts salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Fargo has a housing index of 80 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Fargo costs $260,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $80,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,000 in Fargo versus $1,600 in Worcester.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Fargo scores 98 while Worcester scores 106.
Healthcare costs in Fargo (105) are lower than Worcester (115).
Median household income in Fargo is $55,218 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Fargo.
Amazon affiliate links