Durham vs Bakersfield

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: North Carolina salaries · California salaries

Living in Durham vs Bakersfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Durham has a housing index of 104 while Bakersfield sits at 96 (national average = 100). The median home in Durham costs $340,000 compared to $310,000 in Bakersfield, a difference of $30,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Durham versus $1,200 in Bakersfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Durham scores 100 while Bakersfield scores 100. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Durham (108) are higher than Bakersfield (99).

Median household income in Durham is $57,738 compared to $57,548 in Bakersfield. When adjusted for cost of living, purchasing power is similar in both cities.

Relocating: Durham vs Bakersfield

If you are considering a move between Durham (index: 101) and Bakersfield (index: 101), the 0% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Bakersfield is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Durham can afford $1,347/month, while the median household in Bakersfield can afford $1,343/month. With median homes at $340,000 in Durham versus $310,000 in Bakersfield, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,400/month in Durham and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes about equally far in both cities. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Durham (101) vs Bakersfield (101)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Durham at 101 is 1% above the US average, while Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above average. Both cities are close to the national average in overall costs.

Durham and Bakersfield land within 0 points of each other on the composite index (101 vs 101), so the overall cost picture is similar. Utilities shows the widest single-category margin at 93 versus 106, making it the area where residents will feel the most day-to-day price difference between Durham and Bakersfield. Housing costs are comparable between the two metros, with Durham at 104 and Bakersfield at 96 on the housing sub-index and median home prices of $340,000 and $310,000 respectively. Neither city is cheaper across the board: Durham has an edge in utilities and transportation, while Bakersfield is more affordable for housing and healthcare. Your actual savings depend on which categories consume the biggest share of your personal budget.

For renters: With median rents of $1,400/month in Durham and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, the annual rent difference is approximately $2,400. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $12,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $30,000 difference in median home prices between Durham and Bakersfield translates to roughly $1,800 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links