⚖️ City Comparison

Concord vs Minneapolis

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Concord

California
146
Very Expensive
$486,000
Median Home
$2,150/mo
Median Rent
$84,500
Median Income

Minneapolis

Minnesota
106
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$64,285
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

27% Cheaper

Minneapolis is 27% cheaper than Concord overall. A $75,000 salary in Concord is equivalent to $54,452 in Minneapolis.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Concord (left) vs Minneapolis (right). National average = 100.

Housing
154
Housing
112
Groceries
135
Groceries
104
Utilities
143
Utilities
97
Transportation
140
Transportation
108
Healthcare
136
Healthcare
105

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Concord versus Minneapolis. Differences shown from Concord perspective.

ItemConcordMinneapolisDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,600/mo$1,070/mo+$530.00
2-Bed Rent$2,150/mo$1,500/mo+$650.00
3-Bed Rent$2,910/mo$1,960/mo+$950.00
Bread (loaf)$3.90$2.93+$0.97
Milk (gallon)$5.38$4.28+$1.10
Eggs (dozen)$3.87$3.29+$0.58
Coffee (latte)$7.71$5.90+$1.81
Gas (gallon)$3.99$3.54+$0.45
Restaurant Meal$19.18$14.50+$4.68

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Concord has the same purchasing power as $54,452 in Minneapolis.

Conversely, $75,000 in Minneapolis equals $103,302 in Concord.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$52,987
Concord (California)
$52,537
Minneapolis (Minnesota)

The $450 difference is driven by Minnesota having a higher state income tax rate. California details → · Minnesota details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
146 vs 106

Reading These Numbers: Concord (146) vs Minneapolis (106)

Concord at 146 is 46% above the US average, while Minneapolis at 106 is 6% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Concord, the composite index of 146 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 154, followed by groceries (135), utilities (143), transportation (140), and healthcare (136). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $2,150/mo in Concord and $1,500/mo in Minneapolis, the annual rent difference is approximately $7,800.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $39,000.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $176,000.0 difference in median home prices between Concord and Minneapolis translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Concord vs Minneapolis

Choosing between Concord and Minneapolis involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

When weighing Concord against Minneapolis, think beyond the composite index. Your personal savings rate, retirement timeline, and family size all influence which cost categories dominate your budget. Someone spending sixty percent of income on housing and childcare will experience these two cities very differently than a single renter whose largest variable expense is dining out. Model your own spending breakdown against the category indices above for the most realistic comparison.