⚖️ City Comparison

Chicago vs Warwick

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Chicago

Illinois
107
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$62,097
Median Income

Warwick

Rhode Island
116
Expensive
$350,000
Median Home
$1,570/mo
Median Rent
$61,200
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

8% Cheaper

Chicago is 8% cheaper than Warwick overall. A $75,000 salary in Chicago is equivalent to $81,308 in Warwick.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Chicago (left) vs Warwick (right). National average = 100.

Housing
112
Housing
116
Groceries
104
Groceries
112
Utilities
100
Utilities
113
Transportation
116
Transportation
115
Healthcare
101
Healthcare
121

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Chicago versus Warwick. Differences shown from Chicago perspective.

ItemChicagoWarwickDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,230/mo$1,090/mo+$140.00
2-Bed Rent$1,700/mo$1,570/mo+$130.00
3-Bed Rent$2,220/mo$2,030/mo+$190.00
Bread (loaf)$2.71$3.04$-0.33
Milk (gallon)$4.17$4.27$-0.10
Eggs (dozen)$3.55$3.76$-0.21
Coffee (latte)$6.11$6.20$-0.09
Gas (gallon)$3.57$3.47+$0.10
Restaurant Meal$15.53$17.11$-1.58

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Chicago has the same purchasing power as $81,308 in Warwick.

Conversely, $75,000 in Warwick equals $69,181 in Chicago.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$53,962
Chicago (Illinois)
$54,112
Warwick (Rhode Island)

Both states have similar effective tax rates on this salary level. Illinois details → · Rhode Island details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
107 vs 116

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Warwick (116)

Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Warwick at 116 is 16% above average. The cost difference between these cities is relatively modest.

In Chicago, the composite index of 107 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 112, followed by groceries (104), utilities (100), transportation (116), and healthcare (101). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/mo in Chicago and $1,570/mo in Warwick, the annual rent difference is approximately $1,560.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $7,800.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $40,000.0 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Warwick translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Chicago vs Warwick

Choosing between Chicago and Warwick involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Beyond the numbers shown above, quality of life differences between Chicago and Warwick can meaningfully affect your financial picture in ways the index does not capture. Commute time translates to fuel costs and vehicle depreciation. Climate affects utility bills seasonally. Access to public parks and free cultural venues reduces entertainment spending. Consider these secondary financial effects alongside the direct cost comparisons when making your final decision.