⚖️ City Comparison

Chicago vs Nampa

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Chicago

Illinois
107
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$62,097
Median Income

Nampa

Idaho
94
Below Average
$265,000
Median Home
$1,340/mo
Median Rent
$58,500
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

12% Cheaper

Nampa is 12% cheaper than Chicago overall. A $75,000 salary in Chicago is equivalent to $65,888 in Nampa.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Chicago (left) vs Nampa (right). National average = 100.

Housing
112
Housing
90
Groceries
104
Groceries
85
Utilities
100
Utilities
94
Transportation
116
Transportation
89
Healthcare
101
Healthcare
87

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Chicago versus Nampa. Differences shown from Chicago perspective.

ItemChicagoNampaDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,230/mo$940/mo+$290.00
2-Bed Rent$1,700/mo$1,340/mo+$360.00
3-Bed Rent$2,220/mo$1,750/mo+$470.00
Bread (loaf)$2.71$2.23+$0.48
Milk (gallon)$4.17$3.37+$0.80
Eggs (dozen)$3.55$2.85+$0.70
Coffee (latte)$6.11$5.26+$0.85
Gas (gallon)$3.57$2.89+$0.68
Restaurant Meal$15.53$16.33$-0.80

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Chicago has the same purchasing power as $65,888 in Nampa.

Conversely, $75,000 in Nampa equals $85,372 in Chicago.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$53,962
Chicago (Illinois)
$53,287
Nampa (Idaho)

The $675 difference is driven by Idaho having a higher state income tax rate. Illinois details → · Idaho details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
107 vs 94

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Nampa (94)

Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Nampa at 94 is 6% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Chicago, the composite index of 107 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 112, followed by groceries (104), utilities (100), transportation (116), and healthcare (101). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/mo in Chicago and $1,340/mo in Nampa, the annual rent difference is approximately $4,320.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $21,600.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $45,000.0 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Nampa translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Chicago vs Nampa

Choosing between Chicago and Nampa involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

The cost gap between Chicago and Nampa reflects thousands of individual pricing differences across housing markets, grocery chains, utility providers, and healthcare networks. No two households experience the same effective cost of living even in the same city, which is why the category breakdown matters more than the headline number. Adjust the lifestyle weighting sliders above to see how your spending priorities shift the comparison between these specific metros.