๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Chicago vs Missoula

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Chicago

Illinois
107
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$62,097
Median Income

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

7% cheaper
Chicago is 7% more affordable than Missoula. A $75,000 salary in Missoula is equivalent to $69,783 in Chicago.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
112
Chicago
141
Missoula
Groceries
104
Chicago
103
Missoula
Utilities
100
Chicago
89
Missoula
Transportation
116
Chicago
101
Missoula
Healthcare
101
Chicago
102
Missoula

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$80,607
$75K in Chicago โ†’ Missoula
$69,783
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Chicago

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries ยท Montana salaries

Living in Chicago vs Missoula

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $150,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $1,400 in Missoula.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Chicago scores 104 while Missoula scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are lower than Missoula (102). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Chicago.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links