Chicago vs Lubbock
Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Chicago
Lubbock
๐ก The Verdict
22% cheaper
Lubbock is 22% more affordable than Chicago. A $75,000 salary in Chicago is equivalent to $58,178 in Lubbock.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
๐ฐ Salary Equivalence
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries ยท Texas salaries
Living in Chicago vs Lubbock
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while Lubbock sits at 59 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $175,000 in Lubbock, a difference of $135,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $950 in Lubbock.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Chicago scores 104 while Lubbock scores 93.
Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are higher than Lubbock (90).
Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $49,834 in Lubbock. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Lubbock.
Relocating: Chicago vs Lubbock
If you are considering a move between Chicago (index: 107) and Lubbock (index: 83), the 22% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Lubbock is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.
Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Chicago can afford $1,449/month, while the median household in Lubbock can afford $1,163/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Chicago versus $175,000 in Lubbock, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.
Renting vs buying: At $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Lubbock, renters save significantly in Lubbock. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.
Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Lubbock where costs are 17% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.
Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Lubbock (83)
The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Lubbock at 83 is 17% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.
The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly โ one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.
For renters: With median rents of $1,700/month in Chicago and $950/month in Lubbock, the annual rent difference is approximately $9,000. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $45,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.
For homebuyers: The $135,000 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Lubbock translates to roughly $8,100 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.
๐ Related Tools
๐ Moving & Relocation Resources
Amazon affiliate links