⚖️ City Comparison

Chicago vs Concord

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Chicago

Illinois
107
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$62,097
Median Income

Concord

New Hampshire
113
Above Average
$350,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$58,900
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

5% Cheaper

Chicago is 5% cheaper than Concord overall. A $75,000 salary in Chicago is equivalent to $79,206 in Concord.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Chicago (left) vs Concord (right). National average = 100.

Housing
112
Housing
115
Groceries
104
Groceries
106
Utilities
100
Utilities
107
Transportation
116
Transportation
110
Healthcare
101
Healthcare
113

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Chicago versus Concord. Differences shown from Chicago perspective.

ItemChicagoConcordDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,230/mo$1,110/mo+$120.00
2-Bed Rent$1,700/mo$1,500/mo+$200.00
3-Bed Rent$2,220/mo$1,870/mo+$350.00
Bread (loaf)$2.71$3.05$-0.34
Milk (gallon)$4.17$3.83+$0.34
Eggs (dozen)$3.55$3.34+$0.21
Coffee (latte)$6.11$5.62+$0.49
Gas (gallon)$3.57$3.55+$0.02
Restaurant Meal$15.53$17.19$-1.66

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Chicago has the same purchasing power as $79,206 in Concord.

Conversely, $75,000 in Concord equals $71,018 in Chicago.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$53,962
Chicago (Illinois)
$57,638
Concord (New Hampshire)

The $3676 difference is driven by Illinois having a higher state income tax rate. Illinois details → · New Hampshire details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
107 vs 113

Reading These Numbers: Chicago (107) vs Concord (113)

Chicago at 107 is 7% above the US average, while Concord at 113 is 13% above average. The cost difference between these cities is relatively modest.

In Chicago, the composite index of 107 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 112, followed by groceries (104), utilities (100), transportation (116), and healthcare (101). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,700/mo in Chicago and $1,500/mo in Concord, the annual rent difference is approximately $2,400.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $12,000.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $40,000.0 difference in median home prices between Chicago and Concord translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Chicago vs Concord

Choosing between Chicago and Concord involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

When weighing Chicago against Concord, think beyond the composite index. Your personal savings rate, retirement timeline, and family size all influence which cost categories dominate your budget. Someone spending sixty percent of income on housing and childcare will experience these two cities very differently than a single renter whose largest variable expense is dining out. Model your own spending breakdown against the category indices above for the most realistic comparison.