Charleston vs Bakersfield

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: West Virginia salaries · California salaries

Living in Charleston vs Bakersfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Charleston has a housing index of 62 while Bakersfield sits at 96 (national average = 100). The median home in Charleston costs $135,000 compared to $310,000 in Bakersfield, a difference of $175,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $850 in Charleston versus $1,200 in Bakersfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Charleston scores 97 while Bakersfield scores 100. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Charleston (91) are lower than Bakersfield (99).

Median household income in Charleston is $42,034 compared to $57,548 in Bakersfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Charleston.

Relocating: Charleston vs Bakersfield

If you are considering a move between Charleston (index: 85) and Bakersfield (index: 101), the 16% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Charleston is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Charleston can afford $981/month, while the median household in Bakersfield can afford $1,343/month. With median homes at $135,000 in Charleston versus $310,000 in Bakersfield, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $850/month in Charleston and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, renters save significantly in Charleston. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes further in Charleston where costs are 15% below the national average. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Charleston (85) vs Bakersfield (101)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Charleston at 85 is 15% below the US average, while Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

Bakersfield costs meaningfully more than Charleston, with a 16-point composite gap that translates to real differences in rent, groceries, and daily expenses. The biggest category divergence is housing, where Charleston scores 62 and Bakersfield scores 96. That 34-point gap is the primary driver of the overall cost difference between these two metros. Housing, the largest line item for most households, favors Charleston with indices of 62 versus 96. Median home prices of $135,000 in Charleston and $310,000 in Bakersfield underscore this gap.

For renters: With median rents of $850/month in Charleston and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, the annual rent difference is approximately $4,200. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $21,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $175,000 difference in median home prices between Charleston and Bakersfield translates to roughly $10,500 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links