Fort Lauderdale vs Charleston

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Florida salaries · South Carolina salaries

Living in Fort Lauderdale vs Charleston

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Fort Lauderdale has a housing index of 155 while Charleston sits at 127 (national average = 100). The median home in Fort Lauderdale costs $380,000 compared to $380,000 in Charleston, a difference of $0. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,000 in Fort Lauderdale versus $1,600 in Charleston.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Fort Lauderdale scores 106 while Charleston scores 102.

Healthcare costs in Fort Lauderdale (99) are lower than Charleston (104). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Fort Lauderdale is $54,468 compared to $65,872 in Charleston. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Charleston.

Relocating: Fort Lauderdale vs Charleston

If you are considering a move between Fort Lauderdale (index: 122) and Charleston (index: 110), the 10% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Charleston is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Fort Lauderdale can afford $1,271/month, while the median household in Charleston can afford $1,537/month. With median homes at $380,000 in Fort Lauderdale versus $380,000 in Charleston, homeownership requires above-median income in the pricier market.

Renting vs buying: At $2,000/month in Fort Lauderdale and $1,600/month in Charleston, renters save significantly in Charleston. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Charleston. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Fort Lauderdale (122) vs Charleston (110)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Fort Lauderdale at 122 is 22% above the US average, while Charleston at 110 is 10% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly — one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.

For renters: With median rents of $2,000/month in Fort Lauderdale and $1,600/month in Charleston, the annual rent difference is approximately $4,800. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $24,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $0 difference in median home prices between Fort Lauderdale and Charleston translates to roughly $0 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links