⚖️ City Comparison

Bismarck vs Tucson

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Bismarck

North Dakota
88
Below Average
$373,000
Median Home
$1,530/mo
Median Rent
$45,800
Median Income

Tucson

Arizona
93
Below Average
$265,000
Median Home
$1,100/mo
Median Rent
$43,425
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

5% Cheaper

Bismarck is 5% cheaper than Tucson overall. A $75,000 salary in Bismarck is equivalent to $79,261 in Tucson.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Bismarck (left) vs Tucson (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
83
Groceries
90
Groceries
98
Utilities
99
Utilities
96
Transportation
84
Transportation
99
Healthcare
89
Healthcare
93

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Bismarck versus Tucson. Differences shown from Bismarck perspective.

ItemBismarckTucsonDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,110/mo$830/mo+$280.00
2-Bed Rent$1,530/mo$1,100/mo+$430.00
3-Bed Rent$2,070/mo$1,470/mo+$600.00
Bread (loaf)$2.56$2.77$-0.21
Milk (gallon)$3.56$3.65$-0.09
Eggs (dozen)$3.12$3.19$-0.07
Coffee (latte)$5.43$5.72$-0.29
Gas (gallon)$3.17$2.90+$0.27
Restaurant Meal$12.99$12.79+$0.20

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $79,261 in Tucson.

Conversely, $75,000 in Tucson equals $70,968 in Bismarck.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$56,212
Bismarck (North Dakota)
$55,762
Tucson (Arizona)

The $450 difference is driven by Arizona having a higher state income tax rate. North Dakota details → · Arizona details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
88 vs 93

Reading These Numbers: Bismarck (88) vs Tucson (93)

Bismarck at 88 is 12% below the US average, while Tucson at 93 is 7% below average. The cost difference between these cities is relatively modest.

In Bismarck, the composite index of 88 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (90), utilities (99), transportation (84), and healthcare (89). Housing is the primary cost driver here.

For renters: With median rents of $1,530/mo in Bismarck and $1,100/mo in Tucson, the annual rent difference is approximately $5,160.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $25,800.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $108,000.0 difference in median home prices between Bismarck and Tucson translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Bismarck vs Tucson

Choosing between Bismarck and Tucson involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Long-term affordability in Bismarck versus Tucson depends partly on cost trajectory. Cities experiencing rapid population growth tend to see costs rise faster than established metros where supply has caught up with demand. While our index captures current conditions, consider whether the city trending cheaper today might converge toward average over the next five to ten years as more people discover it. Our quarterly updates help track these shifts over time.