⚖️ City Comparison

Bismarck vs Sacramento

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Bismarck

North Dakota
88
Below Average
$373,000
Median Home
$1,530/mo
Median Rent
$45,800
Median Income

Sacramento

California
128
Expensive
$450,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$64,660
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

31% Cheaper

Bismarck is 31% cheaper than Sacramento overall. A $75,000 salary in Bismarck is equivalent to $109,091 in Sacramento.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Bismarck (left) vs Sacramento (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
163
Groceries
90
Groceries
104
Utilities
99
Utilities
108
Transportation
84
Transportation
111
Healthcare
89
Healthcare
106

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Bismarck versus Sacramento. Differences shown from Bismarck perspective.

ItemBismarckSacramentoDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,110/mo$1,260/mo$-150.00
2-Bed Rent$1,530/mo$1,700/mo$-170.00
3-Bed Rent$2,070/mo$2,230/mo$-160.00
Bread (loaf)$2.56$3.03$-0.47
Milk (gallon)$3.56$3.90$-0.34
Eggs (dozen)$3.12$3.22$-0.10
Coffee (latte)$5.43$5.98$-0.55
Gas (gallon)$3.17$3.55$-0.38
Restaurant Meal$12.99$20.36$-7.37

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $109,091 in Sacramento.

Conversely, $75,000 in Sacramento equals $51,562 in Bismarck.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$56,212
Bismarck (North Dakota)
$52,987
Sacramento (California)

The $3225 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. North Dakota details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
88 vs 128

Reading These Numbers: Bismarck (88) vs Sacramento (128)

Bismarck at 88 is 12% below the US average, while Sacramento at 128 is 28% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Bismarck, the composite index of 88 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (90), utilities (99), transportation (84), and healthcare (89). Housing is the primary cost driver here.

For renters: With median rents of $1,530/mo in Bismarck and $1,700/mo in Sacramento, the annual rent difference is approximately $2,040.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $10,200.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $77,000.0 difference in median home prices between Bismarck and Sacramento translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Bismarck vs Sacramento

Choosing between Bismarck and Sacramento involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

When weighing Bismarck against Sacramento, think beyond the composite index. Your personal savings rate, retirement timeline, and family size all influence which cost categories dominate your budget. Someone spending sixty percent of income on housing and childcare will experience these two cities very differently than a single renter whose largest variable expense is dining out. Model your own spending breakdown against the category indices above for the most realistic comparison.