⚖️ City Comparison

Bismarck vs Los Angeles

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Bismarck

North Dakota
88
Below Average
$373,000
Median Home
$1,530/mo
Median Rent
$45,800
Median Income

Los Angeles

California
166
Extremely Expensive
$850,000
Median Home
$2,700/mo
Median Rent
$65,290
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

47% Cheaper

Bismarck is 47% cheaper than Los Angeles overall. A $75,000 salary in Bismarck is equivalent to $141,477 in Los Angeles.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Bismarck (left) vs Los Angeles (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
262
Groceries
90
Groceries
107
Utilities
99
Utilities
114
Transportation
84
Transportation
118
Healthcare
89
Healthcare
103

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Bismarck versus Los Angeles. Differences shown from Bismarck perspective.

ItemBismarckLos AngelesDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,110/mo$1,990/mo$-880.00
2-Bed Rent$1,530/mo$2,700/mo$-1170.00
3-Bed Rent$2,070/mo$3,660/mo$-1590.00
Bread (loaf)$2.56$3.14$-0.58
Milk (gallon)$3.56$3.91$-0.35
Eggs (dozen)$3.12$3.25$-0.13
Coffee (latte)$5.43$6.16$-0.73
Gas (gallon)$3.17$3.64$-0.47
Restaurant Meal$12.99$24.46$-11.47

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Bismarck has the same purchasing power as $141,477 in Los Angeles.

Conversely, $75,000 in Los Angeles equals $39,759 in Bismarck.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$56,212
Bismarck (North Dakota)
$52,987
Los Angeles (California)

The $3225 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. North Dakota details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
88 vs 166

Reading These Numbers: Bismarck (88) vs Los Angeles (166)

Bismarck at 88 is 12% below the US average, while Los Angeles at 166 is 66% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Bismarck, the composite index of 88 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (90), utilities (99), transportation (84), and healthcare (89). Housing is the primary cost driver here.

For renters: With median rents of $1,530/mo in Bismarck and $2,700/mo in Los Angeles, the annual rent difference is approximately $14,040.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $70,200.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $477,000.0 difference in median home prices between Bismarck and Los Angeles translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Bismarck vs Los Angeles

Choosing between Bismarck and Los Angeles involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Beyond the numbers shown above, quality of life differences between Bismarck and Los Angeles can meaningfully affect your financial picture in ways the index does not capture. Commute time translates to fuel costs and vehicle depreciation. Climate affects utility bills seasonally. Access to public parks and free cultural venues reduces entertainment spending. Consider these secondary financial effects alongside the direct cost comparisons when making your final decision.