๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Birmingham vs St. Paul

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Birmingham

Alabama
87
Below Average
$165,000
Median Home
$1,000/mo
Median Rent
$38,178
Median Income

St. Paul

Minnesota
100
Average
$260,000
Median Home
$1,300/mo
Median Rent
$57,718
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

13% cheaper
Birmingham is 13% more affordable than St. Paul. A $75,000 salary in St. Paul is equivalent to $65,250 in Birmingham.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
67
Birmingham
98
St. Paul
Groceries
96
Birmingham
103
St. Paul
Utilities
92
Birmingham
97
St. Paul
Transportation
99
Birmingham
108
St. Paul
Healthcare
91
Birmingham
105
St. Paul

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$86,207
$75K in Birmingham โ†’ St. Paul
$65,250
$75K in St. Paul โ†’ Birmingham

See exact take-home pay: Alabama salaries ยท Minnesota salaries

Living in Birmingham vs St. Paul

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Birmingham has a housing index of 67 while St. Paul sits at 98 (national average = 100). The median home in Birmingham costs $165,000 compared to $260,000 in St. Paul, a difference of $95,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,000 in Birmingham versus $1,300 in St. Paul.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Birmingham scores 96 while St. Paul scores 103. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Birmingham (91) are lower than St. Paul (105).

Median household income in Birmingham is $38,178 compared to $57,718 in St. Paul. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Birmingham.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links