๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Billings vs Worcester

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Billings

Montana
98
Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,200/mo
Median Rent
$55,438
Median Income

Worcester

Massachusetts
125
Expensive
$340,000
Median Home
$1,600/mo
Median Rent
$52,228
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

22% cheaper
Billings is 22% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $58,800 in Billings.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
93
Billings
152
Worcester
Groceries
99
Billings
106
Worcester
Utilities
89
Billings
122
Worcester
Transportation
101
Billings
103
Worcester
Healthcare
102
Billings
115
Worcester

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$95,663
$75K in Billings โ†’ Worcester
$58,800
$75K in Worcester โ†’ Billings

See exact take-home pay: Montana salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in Billings vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Billings has a housing index of 93 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Billings costs $310,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $30,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,200 in Billings versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Billings scores 99 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in Billings (102) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in Billings is $55,438 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Billings.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links