Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
19% cheaper
Bakersfield is 19% more affordable than Worcester. A $75,000 salary in Worcester is equivalent to $60,600 in Bakersfield.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: California salaries · Massachusetts salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Bakersfield has a housing index of 96 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in Bakersfield costs $310,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $30,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,200 in Bakersfield versus $1,600 in Worcester.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Bakersfield scores 100 while Worcester scores 106.
Healthcare costs in Bakersfield (99) are lower than Worcester (115).
Median household income in Bakersfield is $57,548 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Bakersfield.
Amazon affiliate links