Minneapolis vs Bakersfield

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

💰 Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · California salaries

Living in Minneapolis vs Bakersfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Minneapolis has a housing index of 112 while Bakersfield sits at 96 (national average = 100). The median home in Minneapolis costs $310,000 compared to $310,000 in Bakersfield, a difference of $0. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,500 in Minneapolis versus $1,200 in Bakersfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a narrower gap: Minneapolis scores 104 while Bakersfield scores 100. Both cities are close to the national average for grocery costs.

Healthcare costs in Minneapolis (105) are higher than Bakersfield (99). Both are close to the national average.

Median household income in Minneapolis is $64,285 compared to $57,548 in Bakersfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Bakersfield.

Relocating: Minneapolis vs Bakersfield

If you are considering a move between Minneapolis (index: 106) and Bakersfield (index: 101), the 5% cost difference has real implications for your budget. Bakersfield is the more affordable option, but the right choice depends on your income, career opportunities, and lifestyle priorities.

Housing budget reality: Using the 28% rule (spending no more than 28% of gross income on housing), the median household in Minneapolis can afford $1,500/month, while the median household in Bakersfield can afford $1,343/month. With median homes at $310,000 in Minneapolis versus $310,000 in Bakersfield, both cities offer reasonable homeownership opportunities at median income.

Renting vs buying: At $1,500/month in Minneapolis and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, renters face similar costs in both cities. The rent-to-own ratio in each city determines whether renting or buying offers better value for your situation.

Income adjustment: A $75,000 salary goes significantly further in Bakersfield. Before accepting a job in either city, use the salary equivalence data above to understand what you would need to earn to maintain your current standard of living.

Reading These Numbers: Minneapolis (106) vs Bakersfield (101)

The cost of living index uses 100 as the national average. Minneapolis at 106 is 6% above the US average, while Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above average. Both cities are close to the national average in overall costs.

The overall index is a weighted average of housing (the largest component), groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. Housing typically drives the biggest differences between cities. Even when two cities have similar overall indices, their category-level costs can vary significantly — one city might have expensive housing but cheap groceries, while another is the reverse. Check the category breakdown above for the full picture.

For renters: With median rents of $1,500/month in Minneapolis and $1,200/month in Bakersfield, the annual rent difference is approximately $3,600. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $18,000 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $0 difference in median home prices between Minneapolis and Bakersfield translates to roughly $0 per month in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Amazon affiliate links